TwitterFacebookpinterest

FGB-2


2013


2014


 

Russian engineers tackle problems with MLM/Nauka module

In March, Russia's next addition to the International Space Station, ISS, hit another serious snag on the way to the launch pad in 2018. The 20-ton Multi-Purpose Laboratory Module, MLM, remains grounded, while engineers try to deal with a contamination problem in the spacecraft's propellant tanks.

Bookmark and Share

 

MLM

The design of the MLM module as of 2016.

Read our introductory article on the subject at:

PopTech

From the publisher: Pace of our development depends primarily on the level of support from our readers!
Donate

As of January 2017, the flight manifest for the International Space Station, ISS, called for the launch of the MLM module on December 6 of the same year, followed by its docking at the outpost on Dec. 15, 2017. To free the nadir (Earth-facing) docking port on the Zvezda Service Module, SM, for the new arrival, the Progress MS-06 cargo ship was to undock from the Russian segment, carrying along with it the Pirs Docking Compartment, SO1, which has occupied that location since 2001. The Pirs module would then be deorbited and burn up in the Earth's atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean along with Progress MS-06.

Following the integration of the MLM module, on Jan. 23, 2018, the Soyuz MS-06 transport spacecraft was to undock from the zenith (sky-facing) port of the MIM2 Poisk module, make a quick fly around of the ISS and re-dock at the nadir port of the MLM, becoming the first spacecraft parking at the new module.

To integrate the newly arrived MLM module into the Russian segment, Roskosmos promised to bump the Russian crew onboard the ISS back to three people beginning in March 2018. The cosmonauts were scheduled to conduct multiple spacewalks on the exterior of the MLM module, integrating its systems into the Russian segment. A total of 11 spacewalks were planned to accommodate the module: including four ahead of its arrival and seven more after its docking.

Tank problems threaten MLM schedule

By the end of January 2017, it became clear that the December 2017 launch date for the MLM module could not be sustained. The updated processing schedule to be issued by GKNPTs Khrunichev on January 27, was expected to push the launch to June 2018. However, as of mid-February, the status of the processing remained in limbo.

As it transpired, specialists were unable to clean the module's propellant tanks of the contaminants that had also plagued the MLM's propellant lines and valves.

Since 2013, engineers at RKK Energia and GKNPTs Khrunichev in Moscow have labored on replacing a jungle of pipelines, valves and thrusters, comprising Nauka’s sophisticated propulsion system, which got contaminated with metallic saw dust during the botched upgrades of the module.

tanks

The MLM spacecraft carries a total of six 400-liter cylindrical tanks designated 77KM-6127-0. Two of them are used to store high-pressure gas and four others contain fuel and oxidizer under low pressure with a total mass of 2,432 kilograms. This amount is enough for the MLM to make it to the ISS after separation from the third stage of the Proton launch vehicle.

The repair team had hoped to wash contaminants from the tanks, but it had recently been determined that all efforts to cleanse the vessels had failed. To make matters worse, these tanks had been built decades ago and their key components were no longer in production, in particular, the pipes used for manufacturing the tanks' stringers and the metallic tape used to build sections of their internal bellows.

GKNPTs Khrunichev estimated that the revival of the tanks' production would require 240 new items of manufacturing hardware and around 50 thousand work hours.

The cylindrical tanks are strapped around the module's exterior like bullets in a revolver drum. Because of their unique design, they fit neatly onto the module, leaving enough room to place radiator panels over them. But it also means that no modern tanks can get in their place without cutting through the radiators!

Fortunately, there was a second set of shorter tanks, which was removed from the module (previously called FGB-2) during its conversion from its original role as a backup to the Zarya FGB, the very first piece of the ISS. To make room on the exterior of the converted FGB-2/MLM module for the attachment of a European-built robotic arm and various scientific instruments, the extra set of shorter tanks was removed.

What are the options?

By March 16, experts at RKK Energia evaluated several options for replacing the contaminated tanks on the MLM module. First they looked whether they could install brand-new tanks developed for the new-generation Science and Power Module, NEM.

NEM

A pair of such vessels could be installed on the MLM to accommodate 880 kilograms of propellant. However, due to their size, the tanks would cut through the radiators and even protrude into the payload fairing of the Proton rocket, protecting the MLM spacecraft during ascent through the atmosphere. Even if the radiators and the fairing were modified, the module would still be lacking 1,291 kilogram of propellant required for its planned mission and contingency situations.

Option 2: Progress tanks

progress

Obviously, it was tempting for RKK Energia to consider fitting MLM with standard 210-liter refueling tanks from the Progress cargo ship. It would be feasible to install 10 such tanks into the MLM module in two groups of five accommodating a total propellant supply of 2,352 kilograms. It would be enough for the nominal mission, but, again, it would be also necessary to cut through radiators and Proton's fairing to accommodate them.

Option 3: FGB tanker tanks

short

Engineers then considered using six short tanks, identical to those used for refueling of the ISS on the Zarya FGB module. Six refueling tanks were removed from the former FGB-2 module, during its reconfiguration into the MLM to make room for attachment points of various payloads, instruments and a European robotic arm. If they were put in place of the contaminated long tanks, the short refueling tanks could hold 2,094 kilograms of propellant, just enough to fly MLM's nominal mission sans the orbital insertion maneuver after the separation from the Proton. Alternatively, the module could conduct the orbital insertion maneuver but would then have no propellant left for a contingency rendezvous maneuver in case of a failure of the original rendezvous attempt.

Option 4: Mix and match

mix

The best option was found to be to combine four (short) refueling tanks and a pair of longer (main) tanks which were left over from the FGB-2 project. Four short tanks would take 1,396 kilograms of propellant and two long tanks would take 808 kilograms. It will bring the fuel cache onboard the MLM to 2,204 kilograms, which would be enough to fly MLM's nominal mission. Most importantly, no changes would be required on the nearby radiators or on the rocket's payload fairing.

A summary of tank replacement options on MLM:

-
Description
Propellant capacity
Hardware modifications
Propellant requirements
1
2 tanks from NEM module
880 kilograms
Required
Not enough (1,291-kilogram deficit)
2
10 tanks from Progress
2,352 kilograms
Required
Enough for nominal mission
3
6 FGB refueling tanks
2,094 kilograms
Not required
Enough with limitations
4
4 refueling, 2 main FGB tanks
2,204 kilograms
Not required
Enough for contingencies

 

All MLM tanks turned out to be contaminated. Repair team goes to Plan B

All things considered, the remaining extra tanks from the FGB-2 project could have provided a lifeline for the beleaguered MLM module. That’s is, of course, if they were not plagued with the same contamination problem, which was a million-dollar question.

To find out, investigators conducted vacuuming of the four propellant tanks: BNDO-1, BNDG-3, BVDO, BVDG. A special filter was used to trap particles ejected from the interior surfaces of the tanks' bellows where propellant would be stored during the flight. The subsequent visual inspection of the filter revealed countless shiny metallic particles in all four tanks. Ranging in size from 750 to 1,300 micro-meters, the contaminants were large enough to be visible to the naked eye. As a result, by March 28, all the available tanks were officially disqualified for installation on the MLM module.

According to industry sources, some officials apparently wondered whether it would be possible to avoid cleansing the tanks and instead to rely on filters in the propulsion system designed to weed out occasional contaminants. However propulsion experts warned that massive clogging of the filters could unpredictably change the carefully balanced ratio between liquid fuel and oxidizer entering the engine.

Even worse, the particles could get into the sensitive electric valves of the system and cause them to leak propellant or prevent those valves from cutting off the propellant flow when necessary. These particles could also cause leaks in the pressurization system, in turn leading to undesirable pressure increases in the propulsion system. Although there were backup valves in the network to prevent exactly such a scenario, had the backup valves been breached as well, then all the pressurization gas would have escaped.

Finally, the damage to valves controlling the re-fueling operations could cause leaks during the transfer of propellant from the Progress cargo ships into the tanks of the MLM module.

By March 30, the KB Khimmash propulsion development center certified that the 11D442 main engine for the TKS spacecraft and the MLM/Nauka module had never been tested to work with contaminated propellant.

As a result, on April 1, the MLM project managers made a decision to default back to the use of six original tanks, which would have to be opened up in order to be cleaned and then restored. The cylindrical metal vessel of each tank was expected to be cut open along its longitudinal axis to give engineers the access to its flexible bellows inside. Resembling a harmonica, the bellows are used to force the propellant toward the engines with pressurized gas supplied on its opposite side. The most difficult part of the job would be a thorough cleaning of all the crevices in the internal cavity of the bellows.

The MLM repair team initially planned to limit the cutting of the tanks to its metal vessel structure, which is not in contact with propellant. It could make it possible to extend the flexible internal bladder of the bellows to its full length. With the bellows in its unfurled position, the repair team hoped to be able to thoroughly wash the contaminating metallic dust off its internal cavity.

If the plan worked, there would be no need to cut the flexible membrane of the bellows, containing the propellant, or the bulkhead of the tank, which holds it.

As a result, it would be possible to conduct the thorough washing of the bellows without breaching the structural integrity of the hermetically sealed propellant-containing vessel.

Of course, in the complex and interdependent world of space technology, nobody could tell at the time how long would it take to repair all six tanks, re-assemble the MLM module once again or when it could launch, but it was safe to speculate that at least a year would have to be added to the regular schedule.

In the meantime, the problems plaguing the MLM also blocked the path to orbit for the long-completed Prichal Node Module, UM, (prichal is Russian for "pier") and for the new-generation Science and Power Module, NEM. Not to mention, the ISS itself was not getting younger with its retirement projected between 2024 and 2028.

MLM tanks show early signs of corrosion

To make sure that the contaminated tanks for the MLM module were worth repairing, Roskosmos wanted to confirm that they had remained structurally viable after sitting on the exterior of the MLM/Nauka module for nearly two decades. On March 23, 2017, Roskosmos ordered an inspection of the aluminum structures of the tanks by OAO Komposit, the space industry's key expert center in material science. The specialists did find a number of spots with early signs of corrosion on the bulkheads and stringers of the tanks not covered with the special protective enamel which gives the rest of the module its characteristic black color.

In the meantime, the documented history of the climate control inside the GKNPTs Khrunichev's main assembly hall, where MLM had been stored during much of this time, showed a few rare instances of humidity exceeding the allowable limit of 80 percent, which could cause corrosion. OAO Komposit recommended to shave all the corroded spots off, while monitoring the thickness of the tanks' walls in the affected areas. According to industry sources, it could be necessary to conduct a structural strength analysis of the repaired bulkheads and stringers, taking into account the inevitable thinning of the material.

MLM repair scenario charted

By mid-April, the MLM project managers at GKNPTs Khrunichev prepared a new repair schedule, which aimed to complete the washing of the contaminated tanks in August. However, experts working on the repairs said that in addition to cuts of the tanks along their longitudinal axis, another opening would have to be made on its bulkhead, which holds the bellows, in order to get access to its internal cavity.

In parallel with the work on the tanks, specialists will proceed with the assembly of the propulsion system, which includes newly manufactured components, experts said.

Roskosmos re-tailors ISS schedule after MLM no show

By middle of May 2017, Russian space officials penciled the new launch date for the long-delayed Nauka, MLM, module for October 2018.

To account for the latest postponement in the MLM launch, planners began changing comings and goings of transport ships at the Russian segment of the International Space Station, ISS. The upcoming docking of the Progress MS-06 cargo ship (Mission 67P in the ISS flight manifest) was moved from the Pirs Docking Compartment, SO1, to the aft port of the Zvezda Service Module, SM. According to previous plans, Progress MS-06 was supposed to take with it and discard the Pirs Docking Compartment, SO1, during its departure in December 2017, to make room for the arriving Nauka.

In turn, the Progress MS-05 freighter (ISS mission 66P), which docked at the Pirs Docking Compartment on February 24, will now remain berthed at that port until September 2017. Previously, the spacecraft was scheduled to depart around June 14 to make room for Progress MS-06.

New launch schedule remains uncertain

By the middle of September, RKK Energia prepared a new schedule for the pre-launch processing of the MLM module, which was coordinated with all the sub-contractors involved in the project. It called for the shipment of the module to the technical complex at Site 254 in Baikonur Cosmodrome in May 2018, which would allow its launch in February 2019.

However, the latest problems with tank repairs at GKNPTs Khrunichev prevented the immediate approval of that schedule. Roskosmos State Corporation directed Khrunichev to first complete its timeline for the company's remaining work with MLM by September 22.

Still, RKK Energia proposed to use February 2019 as a reference date for planning future operations onboard the ISS and its Russian Segment.

(To be continued)

Read (and see) much more about this and many other space developments in Russia
in a richly illustrated, large-format glossy edition:

Book

Russian space plans in unprecedented detail!

 

Propellant requirements for the MLM mission:

Orbital insertion maneuver after separation from the launch vehicle
205.4 kilograms
Nominal flight program, including:
1,255.2 kilograms
  • Entering ISS rendezvous orbit
701.2 kilograms
  • Rendezvous and docking maneuvers
554.0 kilograms
Backup rendezvous opportunity
710.0 kilograms
Total (all phases of the flight and backup rendezvous opportunity)*
2,170.6 kilograms

*Emergency deorbiting of the module would require additional 654.2 kilograms of propellant and it would be possible either without an initial maneuver of orbital insertion or before the second docking attempt.

 

Text, photos and illustrations by Anatoly Zak unless stated otherwise; Last update: September 21, 2017

Page Editor: Alain Chabot; Edits: April 5, May 1, Sept. 21, 2017

All rights reserved

Book

IMAGE ARCHIVE

The FGB-2 module, minus its solar panels, sits in the assembly shop at Khrunichev enterprise in Moscow in August 2001. Protective red boxes cover attitude control engines. Copyright © 2001 Anatoly Zak


closeup

A close-up view of the FGB-2's propellant section. Click to enlarge. Copyright © 2001 Anatoly Zak


tanks

Original propellant tanks onboard the FGB-2 module. Click to enlarge. Copyright © 2001 Anatoly Zak


proto

Click to enlarge. Credit: RKK Energia

tanks

A prototype of the MLM module during processing at RKK Energia's Checkout and Testing Station, KIS, in Korolev in 2011. Click to enlarge. Credit: RKK Energia