TwitterFacebook

Searching for details:

The author of this page will appreciate comments, corrections and imagery related to the subject. Please contact Anatoly Zak.


Related pages:

3MV

3MV (Zond)


Venera-7

Missions to Venus


Kosmos-482

Venera-72 (Kosmos-482)


 

 

 

 

 

 

Site news | Site map | About this site | About the author | Testimonials | Mailbox | ADVERTISE! | DONATE!

-

Zond finally goes public

Previous chapter: Mission of Kosmos-27 (3MV-1 No. 5)

Bookmark and Share

Drawing

1 Thermal control system radiators
2 Low-gain antennas
3 Earth orientation sensor (29K)
4 High-precision solar orientation sensor (25K)
5 Parabolic antenna
6 Attitude control sensors
7 Scientific instruments sensors
8 Pneumatic attitude control system
9 Descent capsule
10 Orbital manuevering system, KDU
11 Permanent solar orientation sensor, (21K)
12 Orbital module
13 Solar panels
14 Magnetometer boom with descent capsule testing antenna

Above: Zond-1 (3MV-1 No. 4) spacecraft. (52)


The 3MV-1 No. 4 spacecraft arrived to Tyuratam on March 11, 1964. After learning the cause of the previous failure on March 27, technicians needed just a soldering tool and some 20 minutes of work inside the avionics box of the BOZ unit to fix the problem, which had doomed at least three planetary missions! (52)

The 3MV-1 No. 4 spacecraft equipped with a lander designed to land on Venus lifted off from Site 1 in Tyuratam on April 2, 1964, at 05:42:40 Moscow Time. This time, the 8K78 (Molniya) rocket performed flawlessly, with its third stage (Block I) inserting the payload into the initial parking orbit around the Earth and separating. Block L fourth stage then fired successfully, propelling the spacecraft into an orbit around the Sun with a period of 290 days and heading to Venus. (227) The probe then successfully separated from Block L, however a leak was detected in the pressurized compartment of the spacecraft. In just a week, the pressure inside dropped to just 1 millimeter of the mercury table.

Immediately, it was clear that with such a major problem, the spacecraft would not be able to fulfill its mission, because sensitive electronics inside the orbital module, such as radio-transmitters, were not designed to function in vacuum. Therefore, it was not politically acceptable to announce the mission as Venera-2. At the same time, the spacecraft had left the Earth orbit and was heading into deep space, which would not fit very well into the profile of faceless Kosmos missions. As a result, it was decided to announce this launch as Zond-1. After all, it had become an endurance test vehicle, as it had been originally envisioned in the Zond project.

Ironically, on April 15, Korolev received a response to his March 23 letter to Sergei Vekshinsky, a top Soviet specialist in vacuum electronics, who agreed to consult OKB-1 on reliable pressurization of spacecraft during long-duration missions. (84) However it was too late for Zond-1. As expected, the probe's main transmitters fell silent.

Until May 25, 1964, ground control was able to communicate with the spacecraft thanks to functioning transmitters and batteries onboard the lander. (52) The spacecraft was also able to orient itself in space using star trackers. As a result, ground control conducted two trajectory correction maneuvers, one at a distance of 560,000 kilometers from Earth and another 14 million kilometers away. (2) The second firing was off by 20 meters per second, possibly due to a malfunction in the propulsion system. (202)

Ultimately, at least one of the star trackers was apparently lost, making accurate orientation impossible. (202) The spacecraft was then commanded to enter into gyroscopic stabilization, which still enabled to conduct communications until around mid-June, or about a month before its rendezvous with Venus. The dead spacecraft then drifted as close as 110,000 kilometers from Venus around July 19, 1964. (52)

Western public sources identified this mission as a Venus flyby, again, with no way of knowing that it was carrying a lander. (185)

Taking a lesson from the failure, the OKB-1 design bureau introduced low-frequency vibration tests for all future pressurized spacecraft compartments and x-ray inspection of all welding lines. Korolev was still upset enough about the depressurization of the Zond vehicle in November 1964, when during a conference of his bureau's Communist Party members, he mentioned the incident as an example of poor performance by his employees. (84)

In 1994, a drawing of the 3MV-1 No. 4 (Zond-1) spacecraft was published for the first time, but no photos of this historic vehicle are apparently available.

Next chapter: Venera-72

Read (and see) much more about many other space developments in Russia
in a richly illustrated, large-format glossy edition:

RUSSIA IN SPACE

The Past Explained, the Future Explored

 

Bookmark and Share


APPENDIX

Zond-1 mission at a glance (202):

Spacecraft

3MV-1 No. 4

Launch vehicle

8K78M (Molniya-M) No. G15000-28

Launch date

1964 April 2, 05:42:40 Moscow Time

Flight plan

Venus landing

Flight status

Failed in route to Venus

 

Article by Anatoly Zak; last update: April 1, 2014

Page editor: Alain Chabot; last edit: March 31, 2014

All rights reserved

 

Book

SIGNED COPIES NOW AVAILABLE!


MEDIA ARCHIVE

launch

A 8K78 (Molniya) rocket lifts off from Site 1 in Tyuratam. Credit: RKK Energia


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Site news | Site map | About this site | About the author | Testimonials | Mailbox | ADVERTISE! | DONATE!